Part of my practice routine is to bowl between two chalk marks separated by a
space the diameter of a jack. These two marks are placed 5 meters in advance of
the front edge of the mat.
This way I get unambiguous visual feedback
about how precise my control of line is. But, when I was doing this, I
discovered a curious thing. Sometimes my line is right-on-the-money but still
the bowl ends up very far away from the resting place of all the other practice
bowls delivered before and after the
suspect one. If I was in a competition, I might take this bad outcome from a
single delivery as evidence that my line was wrong and I might deliver the next
bowl wider or narrower as the case required. What this practice evidence showed
me was that such a change could be completely wrong. I may just have
encountered a misfire. The right course is probably just to continue
subsequent bowling with no change in aim line. It is only if you are hitting
your aim line- and two consecutive bowls go errant in the same way- that it is
proven that it is your aim line that needs to change.
I got these sometimes erratic results on a synthetic carpet using fairly narrow
Taylor Vector VS bowls while bowling diagonally on the green from corner to corner.
(I do this to practice the firmer delivery I need on the slower natural grass.) I could actually see, in the case
of some of these misfired bowls, that the bowl tried to get over a seam, failed,
’backed up’, and came at the seam again. Therefore, this observation might not be general but just particular to narrow bowls on a fast synthetic surface with slightly raised seams. Because changing after one errant bowl has caused me problems before though, I don't think so.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please share your own insights and experience.