Knowing Your Partners’ Bowls: Advising a Teammate Regarding Line

Do you play often with the same team members? Most likely - yes.

Have you ever practiced using their bowls? Do you know how the bias of their bowls compares to your own? Can you tell that team member what his aim point should be on the forward bank, succinctly but precisely, as you pass him at mid-rink during the first or second end? 

No or much less likely- right?

What I propose here is that you schedule a practice session with each of your regular partners during which you each deliver two of your own bowls followed by two of that partner’s. From this, you discover the correction factor for calculating your colleague’s bias based on your own. 

The other thing you need to accomplish is to have adequate common terminology for describing recommended aim points on the forward bank.

The unit of measure I use is the half-rink width (HRW). This I define as the distance between the center-line marker and one of the rink boundary markers. Many clubs actually provide intermediate marks on the bank dividing the half-rink width into thirds! This is a violation of the Laws of Bowls Crystal Mark 3. Nevertheless, you will often see it, at least in Canada.

Thus moving from the center line outward I can specify 1/3 HRW, 2/3 HRW, 1 HRW (the boundary) 1 1/3 HRW, 1 2/3 HRW, 2 HRW (adjacent rink number), and so on. This can be abbreviated to: center line, 1/3, 2/3, boundary, 1 1/3, 1 2/3,  rink number, and so on. 

So, suppose I am leading and my partner is skipping. I know from practice that his bowls are wider than mine by about 1/3 HRW. Now, for example, suppose I am bowling the first end, delivering over the center front edge of the mat and I discover that on the right-hand side of the rink, my aim point is the boundary marker. I then can anticipate that my partner’s starting aim point should be 1 1/3 on that side and as I pass him  at mid-rink when he is going to the mat to deliver the skip’s bowls, I tell him, “1 1/3 on the right.”

It is crucial for you and your teammates to be crystal clear whether you are reporting the bias you are using or the corrected bias that they should use. 

In the example above, when I tell him 1 1/3, he must know without a doubt that this is the aim point he should use and not the one I found good for me!  In the alternative, if you have agreed that you will report your bias and he will do the correction I would have said, “The boundary on the right.”

Of course, in this case, as skip, he will have been watching all my deliveries and may have a fair idea of what the line should be, but it is not always easy to figure this out from a position just behind the jack. Furthermore, the information you provide is just a starting point to which all bowlers add their own accumulating information.

In Support of Trial Ends at Lawn Bowls

 In Toronto Canada, at the clubs where I am a member, no trial ends (as in The Laws of Bowls Section 5.1) are allowed before either a social game or an intra-club tournament match. Similarly, in local open inter-club tournaments, I have not encountered trial ends. In the provincial playdowns, on the other hand, there are trial ends.

In Canada, for domestic play, ‘the Controlling Body can limit the number of trial ends to be played (no trial ends or one trial end in one direction). It can also decide whether the trial ends are played immediately before or immediately after the scheduled start time for the game.’

The most common reason for denying trial ends is that it unnecessarily extends the duration of play. This is incorrect. There is no requirement that any player to participate in the trial ends, there are only some rules governing the management of practice when everyone is participating. Since the regular rules of play are not enforced during trial ends, things like playing out of turn or foot faulting have no real meaning. Furthermore, the local organizers are empowered to require that trial ends be completed before the official start time for the games. So quite the opposite, encouraging trial ends would result in fewer players arriving at the last minute for their game! 

What is more, having trial ends will, I think, encourage more beginning bowlers to participate in competitions. Thinking back, what worried me most when I was a new bowler, was looking ridiculous when delivering my opening bowls in a match. Trial ends would reduce this fear. (Before a match, practice at right angles to the direction of match play, which is permitted, already allows one to get an idea of proper weight.) 

The most substantive problems where no trial ends are allowed are:

1. Not having trial ends can give an advantage to teams with members from the club hosting the event. 

2. Because there is no opportunity for the lead to discover the more playable hand during trial ends, it introduces a greater element of luck rather than skill into the first few ends.

3. Not having trial ends removes the opportunity for any player to try out, in a limited way, different sets of bowls before the match play begins.

4. Not having trial ends removes the opportunity to assess your opponent’s strengths and weaknesses before the matchplay begins.

5. It provides an unfair advantage to the team bowling second in the first two ends.

There is no good reason to disallow trial ends and a few good reasons to promote them.

A Novel Way to Introduce Beginners to Competitive Play at Lawn Bowls: Retaining New Bowlers

 

We must be doing something wrong. The middle to older demographic, whom we expect to be interested in taking up lawn bowls has yet to arrive.  Bowls clubs are closing.

My hypothesis is that the instructing period is too long, we need to get new bowlers into real games more quickly. It is taking too long for initiates to pick up what is needed to fit into a game with more experienced bowlers.

To address this I propose a very slightly modified game that enables one experienced bowler on each team to be with the beginning bowler, coaching and encouraging throughout the play.

The setup is just a game of fours with the difference that the tyro leads each deliver three bowls. Thus it is a standard game of fours with the difference that nine bowls are delivered by each side in an end.

Why will this provide more support for the starting bowler and enable him or her to get actually playing a game sooner? In the fours game, the lead and second are physically together all the time. If the person playing second, quietly coaches the new lead throughout the match—“Now you center the mat.” “Now you deliver the jack and guide skip to center it.” “The aim line is about the number sign on the adjacent rink.” “Check to see whether your bowl is inside or outside the rink.” etc. then the lead will feel more at ease and will be less likely to be criticized by other irritated players who want to play faster games.  With someone dedicated to keeping the new bowler aware of both aspects of a good delivery and their team duties, they can begin actually playing games after less instruction and practice.

This may work or may not. What is certain is something has to change or our great game is a goner!  

Beating the Last Bowl at Lawn Bowling

 

To win at bowls one does not need to play superbly. All one needs to do is play better than the opposition. If every time you deliver a bowl it finishes closer to the jack than the opposition bowl that preceded it, your side will be heavily favored to win that match (you can still lose to an opponent’s last bowl).

“That is obvious,” you may say, “but how is that approach superior to the standard idea of just consistently drawing well and protecting against unexpected jack movements?”

The standard approach assumes a perfectly flat green. When this is the case, mat position and jack length don’t change the delivery angle. You learn the proper bias from a few of your own prior bowls. You don’t need to be concerned to watch your opponent’s deliveries. You have all the knowledge you will need to deliver your own bowls. You often see this illustrated by professional bowlers playing indoors on a near-perfect carpet. They wander off between bowls and pay little attention to what their opposition is doing.

Outdoors, and particularly if the rink is imperfect, I find that standing immediately behind my opponent and watching precisely the line being taken gives some surprising insights into the variability in line that arises when the mat is moved and the jack length is changed. Having seen precisely the line taken by that preceding bowl and seeing where it ended up provides me with the best information for how to beat that last bowl to finish closer to my target.