Beside the skills of
the team members as individuals, what advantages can one triples team have over
another in lawn bowls?
In the opening end, each team member delivers an opening bowl, under
circumstances where (s)he does not know the amount of grass to give for a draw
shot. The lead can get no advice, but the other team members need to be able to
convert information from those deliveries to arrive at an aim line useful for
their own shots. Therefore, team members must know their partners’ bowls. For
example, if the lead reports that on the left side (s)he needs to aim at the
boundary mark, the second should know that, for his(her) bowls, that translates
into aiming, for example, two feet wide of the boundary marker. Or if only the
vice has bowled the wide side in one of the directions, the skip needs to be
able to interpret the information that the vice gained aiming on that side. The
object is to provide to each team member whatever useful information another
team member possesses; but, in a form that is adjusted for any differences between
their bowls and/or their handedness.
A second area of potential advantage is in communication between the head and
the mat. This is done by signaling, since calling out invariably proves
inadequate over this distance, as we all have experienced. Signals should enable
the person at the head to direct, and the person on the mat to ask questions. For
some signals it matters little if they are obvious to opponents. For others,
the signal’s meaning must be opaque to the opponents. Signals cannot meet every
need. In complex situations, when the rules allow, the bowler should be called
to the head to confer with the skip.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please share your own insights and experience.